<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>LexCircuit Blog</title>
    <link>https://lexcircuit.com/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://lexcircuit.com/blog/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Signed opinion from the people behind LexCircuit, written in a personal capacity.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 17:02:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>California will license the people who audit AI. Here is what a law firm buyer should do before 2029.</title>
      <link>https://lexcircuit.com/blog/california-ai-auditor-registry-what-a-law-firm-buyer-should-do-now/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://lexcircuit.com/blog/california-ai-auditor-registry-what-a-law-firm-buyer-should-do-now/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 16:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>SB 813 and AB 1405 build the supply side of an AI audit market and leave the buying to us. Fine, as long as we treat a vendor&apos;s audit letter as a question, not an answer.</description>
      <dc:creator>Kenny Le</dc:creator>
      <category>AI</category>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <category>Vendors</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
