S.D.N.Y. sanctions two lawyers over six fabricated citations and sets a verification standard for future filings
A Southern District of New York judge imposed sanctions on two lawyers whose brief cited six cases that do not exist, referring both to the state bar and ordering them to notify their client. The court found the citations were generated by an AI research tool and filed without verification. Sanctions include a monetary penalty and mandatory continuing education. The opinion sets out a verification standard that the court says it will apply to future filings across its docket.
Read the long piece on LexRegister
Key points
- Penalty reported as $5,000 by Reuters and Law360; Bloomberg Law reports $7,500. ReutersLaw360Bloomberg Law
- Six of the brief's citations were fabricated; two more misstated holdings. Courthouse News Service
- Both lawyers were referred to the state bar's disciplinary committee. Above the LawReuters
- The court ordered the firm to notify its client in writing within seven days. Law360
Sources28 articles across 21 outlets
ABA Journal
Above the Law
Bloomberg Law
Courthouse News Service
Law360
Reuters
The American Lawyer
Artificial Lawyer
Corporate Counsel
Financial Times
Global Legal Post
JD Supra
Law.com
LawSites
Legal Dive
Legal Futures
Legal IT Insider
Legaltech News
National Law Review
The Lawyer
Thomson Reuters Institute
Filed under
Court orderN.Y.U.S.Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureS.D.N.Y.S.D.N.Y., Halloran, J.LitigationProfessional responsibilityFor practitionersFor governance