Consumers sue Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, and Google alleging antitrust pact to slow AI development
Subscribers to paid artificial intelligence services sued Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, and Google in the Northern District of California on September 18, 2026, alleging the companies formed an illegal horizontal agreement to slow frontier model improvements. The complaint claims public statements endorsing coordinated development pacing, presented as AI safety measures, constitute an unlawful restraint on output and product quality under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, depriving consumers of faster competitive innovations.
Filing (U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)) → · Bloomberg Law, Politico, The Hill +1
Read the long piece on LexRegister
Key points
- Buist v. Anthropic, No. 3:26-cv-10693, alleges horizontal coordination under Sherman Act Section 1 to restrict output and product quality across frontier AI models.U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)Bloomberg Law
- Plaintiffs define the relevant market as paid consumer subscriptions to general-purpose frontier AI assistants, covering ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini.U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)
- The complaint cites public executive statements and multi-company working group meetings since July 2026 as evidence of an actionable conspiracy.U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)PoliticoThe Hill
- Plaintiffs argue each company can set its own safety thresholds and guardrails without agreeing with rivals, and that no statute exempts the alleged pact.U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)PoliticoThe Hill
- The proposed class action seeks treble damages under Clayton Act Section 4 and injunctive relief under Section 16 barring horizontal agreements.U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)Bloomberg Law
Sources5 articles across 5 outlets
Bloomberg Law
Dario Amodei (personal site)
Politico
The Hill
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (ECF No. 1, LexRegister copy)