Skip to content
Law and legal tech, in three minutesGet the 7 a.m. briefDaily Brief PodcastMenu

Texas Supreme Court justices signal openness to AI-generated deposition transcripts

Several Texas Supreme Court justices indicated during October 6, 2026, oral arguments that the cost savings of AI-transcribed depositions may outweigh accuracy concerns. The case, a wrongful termination suit by Patrick Hughey against Reddico Construction Co., asks whether he can use an AI-generated transcript that lower courts excluded because a certified shorthand reporter did not prepare it.

Filing (Bloomberg Law) → · ABA Journal

Key points

  • The Texas Supreme Court heard arguments on whether an AI-generated deposition transcript can be used as evidence.Bloomberg LawABA Journal
  • Plaintiff Patrick Hughey transcribed a deposition of a Reddico Construction representative using AI software.Bloomberg Law
  • The trial court struck the transcript because no certified shorthand reporter prepared it, and an appeals court affirmed.Bloomberg LawABA Journal
  • Justice Evan Young said courts can address a faulty transcript using the deposition recording or by ordering a certified shorthand reporter to redo it.Bloomberg Law
  • The Texas Deposition Reporters Association argued state law limits who may transcribe depositions.Bloomberg Law
  • The case is In re Hughey, No. 25-0463, in the Texas Supreme Court.Bloomberg Law

Sources2 articles across 2 outlets

Filed under

LitigationTex.Tex.LitigationTechnologyFor practitioners