Skip to content
Law and legal tech, in three minutesGet the 7 a.m. briefDaily Brief PodcastMenu
UK · EWHCLitigation

High Court rejects claim against Vincents despite negligent-advice finding

The High Court dismissed Niprose Investment’s claim against Vincents Solicitors despite finding negligent advice about deposit-release terms, Legal Futures reported. The court found that the breached duty did not cover losses caused by the property developer’s insolvency and the development’s failure, and that Vincents had adequately warned about those separate risks.

Filing (Legal Futures) →

Key points

  • Legal Futures reported that Niprose lost £300,000 in deposits on eight Liverpool apartments.Legal Futures
  • The report said Vincents charged £3,796 for conveyancing.Legal Futures
  • According to Legal Futures, the deposit-holder was not required to verify documents supporting requests to release funds.Legal Futures
  • The report said the judge found no other breaches and that related claims remained outstanding.Legal Futures

Sources1 article across 1 outlet

Filed under

LitigationUKEWHCProfessional responsibilityReal estateLitigationFor practitioners